Significan Concerns At HMP Bristol
17 September 2013, 06:00
A report has highlighted 'significant concerns' at HMP Bristol after an unannounced inspection by the Chief Inspector of prisons Nick Hardwick.
HMP Bristol is a medium-sized local prison, much of it dating from the 19th century. It receives remand and convicted prisoners, often straight from the streets.
At its last inspection in 2010, inspectors noted improvements and described a well led prison that had a clear sense of direction. The prison had recently undergone a major reorganisation of management and staffing and this inspection noted several significant concerns.
Prisoner turnover at Bristol was extremely high, with over 70% of prisoners staying for less than three months. This made the job of managers and staff very difficult.
Inspectors were concerned to find that:
- although levels of violence were similar to comparable prisons, too many prisoners felt unsafe or victimised
- procedures to tackle violence and delinquency were lacking;
- the quality of staff supervision on the wings was not always adequate;
- significant numbers of prisoners reported that it was easy to get drugs in the prison or that they had developed a problem while there;
- prisoners could not get enough clean clothes or clothes that fitted, adequate bedding or cleaning materials;
- much of the prison was dirty and prisoners complained of cockroach infestation;
- inspectors observed some disturbing and dismissive attitudes from some staff;
- the promotion of equality had been neglected and had only recently begun to receive appropriate attention;
- during the working day it was normal to find about half the prison's population locked in cell
- there was only enough work, training and activity for two-thirds of the population but even this was not used efficiently with much unoccupied.
- support for those at risk of suicide or self-harm was reasonably good and the prison had been proactive in developing work to promote adult safeguarding for the clearly vulnerable;
- security procedures were broadly proportionate;
- foreign national prisoners received some helpful support;
- the prison was largely meeting the resettlement challenges and needs presented by a very short-term population and was addressing a range of demands.